Extending Nunchaku to Dependent Type Theory

Nunchaku is a new higher-order counterexample generator based on a sequence of transformations from polymorphic higher-order logic to first-order logic. Unlike its predecessor Nitpick for Isabelle, it is designed as a stand-alone tool, with frontends for various proof assistants. In this short paper, we present some ideas to extend Nunchaku with partial support for dependent types and type classes, to make frontends for Coq and other systems based on dependent type theory more useful.Comment: In Proceedings HaTT 2016, arXiv:1606.0542

Foundational Extensible Corecursion

This paper presents a formalized framework for defining corecursive functions safely in a total setting, based on corecursion up-to and relational parametricity. The end product is a general corecursor that allows corecursive (and even recursive) calls under well-behaved operations, including constructors. Corecursive functions that are well behaved can be registered as such, thereby increasing the corecursor's expressiveness. The metatheory is formalized in the Isabelle proof assistant and forms the core of a prototype tool. The corecursor is derived from first principles, without requiring new axioms or extensions of the logic

SAT-Inspired Higher-Order Eliminations

We generalize several propositional preprocessing techniques to higher-order logic, building on existing first-order generalizations. These techniques eliminate literals, clauses, or predicate symbols from the problem, with the aim of making it more amenable to automatic proof search. We also introduce a new technique, which we call quasipure literal elimination, that strictly subsumes pure literal elimination. The new techniques are implemented in the Zipperposition theorem prover. Our evaluation shows that they sometimes help prove problems originating from Isabelle formalizations and the TPTP library.Comment: 23 pages, 1 figur

Foundational, compositional (co)datatypes for higher-order logic: category theory applied to theorem proving

Interactive theorem provers based on higher-order logic (HOL) traditionally follow the definitional approach, reducing high-level specifications to logical primitives. This also applies to the support for datatype definitions. However, the internal datatype construction used in HOL4, HOL Light, and Isabelle/HOL is fundamentally noncompositional, limiting its efficiency and flexibility, and it does not cater for codatatypes. We present a fully modular framework for constructing (co)datatypes in HOL, with support for mixed mutual and nested (co)recursion. Mixed (co)recursion enables type definitions involving both datatypes and codatatypes, such as the type of finitely branching trees of possibly infinite depth. Our framework draws heavily from category theory. The key notion is that of a bounded natural functor—an enriched type constructor satisfying specific properties preserved by interesting categorical operations. Our ideas are implemented as a definitional package in Isabelle, addressing a frequent request from users

Language and Proofs for Higher-Order SMT (Work in Progress)

Satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solvers have throughout the years been able to cope with increasingly expressive formulas, from ground logics to full first-order logic modulo theories. Nevertheless, higher-order logic within SMT is still little explored. One main goal of the Matryoshka project, which started in March 2017, is to extend the reasoning capabilities of SMT solvers and other automatic provers beyond first-order logic. In this preliminary report, we report on an extension of the SMT-LIB language, the standard input format of SMT solvers, to handle higher-order constructs. We also discuss how to augment the proof format of the SMT solver veriT to accommodate these new constructs and the solving techniques they require.Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2017, arXiv:1712.0089

Formalizing the Metatheory of Logical Calculi and Automatic Provers in Isabelle/HOL (Invited Talk)

International audienceIsaFoL (Isabelle Formalization of Logic) is an undertaking that aims at developing formal theories about logics, proof systems, and automatic provers, using Isabelle/HOL. At the heart of the project is the conviction that proof assistants have become mature enough to actually help researchers in automated reasoning when they develop new calculi and tools. In this paper, I describe and reflect on three verification subprojects to which I contributed: a first-order resolution prover, an imperative SAT solver, and generalized term orders for λ-free higher-order logic

Machine Learning for Instance Selection in SMT Solving

International audienceSMT solvers are among the most suited tools for quantifier-free first-order problems, and their support for quantified formulas has been improving in recent years. To instantiate quantifiers, they rely on heuristic techniques that generate thousands of instances, most of them useless. We propose to apply state-of-the-art machine learning techniques as classifiers for instances on top of the instantiation process. We show that such techniques can indeed decrease the number of generated useless instances. We envision that this could lead to more efficient SMT solving for quantified problems. Satisfiability-modulo-theories (SMT) solvers are among the best backends for verification tools and "hammers" in proof assistants. When proof obligations contain quantified formulas, SMT solvers rely on instantiation, replacing quantified subformulas by sets of ground instances. Three main techniques have been designed: enumerative [11], trigger-based [4], and conflict-based [12] instantiation. Among these, only conflict-based instantiation computes instances that are guaranteed to be relevant, but it is incomplete and is normally used in combination with other techniques. Enumerative and trigger-based techniques are highly heuristic and generate a large number of instances, most of them useless. As a result, the search space of the solver explodes. Reducing the number of instances could improve the solver's efficiency and success rate within a given time limit. We propose to use a state-of-the-art machine learning algorithm as a predictor over the generated set of instances to filter out irrelevant instances, and thus decrease the number of instances given to the ground solver. The predictor is invoked after each instantiation round to rate the potential usefulness of each generated instance. Several strategies are then used to build a subset of potentially relevant instances that are immediately added to the ground solver. Adding the other instances is postponed. We conducted our experiment in veriT [2], an SMT solver that implements all three in-stantiation techniques described above. We chose as predictor the XGBoost gradient boosting toolkit [3] with the binary classification objective. This configuration had already been used successfully in the context of theorem proving [6, 10]. Choosing a suitable set of features is crucial for effective machine learning. The features determine how precise the representation of the problem is. Previous works already investigate features for theorem proving [1, 5, 6, 8-10]. Our features are more specifically inspired by ENIGMA [6] and RLCoP [7]. They are basically term symbols and term walks with symbol sequences projected to features using Vowpal Wabbit hashing. Term variables and Skolem constants are translated analogously to constants. The model is further enriched with abstract features such as term size, term depth, and the number of instances. To encode our problem into sparse vectors, we use three kinds of information available to the solver: the ground part of the formula (set of literals l 1 ,. .. , l m), the quantified formul

Selected Extended Papers of ITP 2016: Preface

International audienc